• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation

Franklin Schargel

Developing World Class Schools and Graduates

  • Blog
  • 15 Strategies
  • About
  • Dropout Prevention
  • Safe Schools
  • School Success
  • At-Risk Youth
  • All Books

Blog

Test-Based Incentive Programs Have Not Consistently Raised Student Achievement in U.S.

ScienceDaily “” Despite being used for several decades, test-based incentives have not consistently generated positive effects on student achievement, says a new report from the National Research Council. The report examines evidence on incentive programs, which impose sanctions or offer rewards for students, teachers, or schools on the basis of students’ test performance. Federal and state governments have increasingly relied on incentives in recent decades as a way to raise accountability in public education and in the hope of driving improvements in achievement.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110526141507.htm

Enough said.  The latest flavor of the day is tying teacher evaluations to student performance on high stakes annual standardized exit exams which don’t work.  What do you think will be the next flavor of the day?

School-level incentives — like those of No Child Left Behind — produce some of the larger effects among the programs studied, but the gains are concentrated in elementary grade mathematics and are small in comparison with the improvements the nation hopes to achieve, the report says. Evidence also suggests that high school exit exam programs, as currently implemented in many states, decrease the rate of high school graduation without increasing student achievement.

Incentives’ Effects on Student Achievement

Attaching incentives to test scores can encourage teachers to focus narrowly on the material tested — in other words, to “teach to the test” — the report says. As a result, students’ knowledge of the part of the subject matter that appears on the test may increase while their understanding of the untested portion may stay the same or even decrease, and the test scores may give an inflated picture of what students actually know with respect to the full range of content standards.

To control for any score inflation caused by teaching to the test, it is important to evaluate the effects of incentive programs not by looking at changes in the test scores tied to the incentives, but by looking at students’ scores on “low stakes” tests — such as the National Assessment of Educational Progress — that are not linked to incentives and are therefore less likely to be inflated, the report says.

The study also examined evidence on the effects of high school exit exams, which are currently used by 25 states and typically involve tests in multiple subjects, all of which students must pass in order to graduate. This research suggests that such exams decrease the rate of high school graduation without improvements in student achievement as measured by low-stakes tests.

The study was sponsored by Carnegie Corporation of New York and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies. They are private, nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under a congressional charter. The Research Council is the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering.

Originally posted on July 30, 2011 by Franklin Schargel

Dropout Prevention Sessions in Tennessee

Franklin will be presenting a number of workshops in the state of Tennessee during the month of September.  If you are in Tennessee during September, stop by.

September 6 – Nashville

September 8 –  Knoxville

September 28 – Jackson

Originally posted on July 27, 2011 by Franklin Schargel

Kudos from Virginia

Franklin recently spoke in Virginia and received rave reviews.  Here are a selection of them:

“Franklin sees the needs of students first, not their ethnicity and biased expectations.”  S. Perrin, Teacher

“One of the best presentations I have ever attended.  I wish all educators could experience this empowerment.”  T. Hudgins, 1st grade teacher

“Franklin reminds us that we teach children, not subject material.”  J. Riva, Math teacher

“His presentation goes to the core of our teaching system inequities.  Presents very simple, common sense ideas that can be implemented with just a change in our attitude and how we perceive our students.” Science Faculty Member

“Franklin is a dynamic speaker with heart and soul!  Franklin’s passion is contagious and very motivating.”  C. Balderson, Principal

“The program was one of the few staff development sessions that I have attended where I truly believed the presenter understood the challenges of today’s educator.”  H. Poulson, 1st grade teacher

“Lots of speakers know the theory, but Mr. Schargel has actually been in the trenches.”  S. Rushing, FACS  Teacher

Originally posted on July 21, 2011 by Franklin Schargel

Kudos from Garland Texas

Franklin recently spoken in Garland, Texas.  Here are some of the written comments:

“Very motivating to help our struggling learners succeed.”  C. Kent, Student Success Coordinator

“Real world application.”  T. Anders, English Teacher

“Strategies with little or no impact on the budget. Great presentation” F. Rush, Teacher

“The two videos at the end were encouraging and emotionally moving.” “informative and inspiring data to prove his statements and  real life experiences to back them up.” H.S. Principal

“Real strategies for real problems.”  L. Fussell, Principal

“Eye opening.” Teacher

“It made me proud to be an educator.” S. Dorman,Counselor

“Real, fun and inspirational.”  M. Brieske, Counselor

“The presentation was filled with excellent, valuable information.  Extremely passionate, inspiring.”  Curriculum Director

“Outstanding” P. Montgomery, House Principal

“What education should be about. Thanks for the refresher course.”  S. Schwarz, Counselor

“Absolutely wonderful!  Interesting, stimulating and motivating.”  Counselor

“Franklin’s program is insightful, not to mention extremely useful.”  P. Herron, English Teacher

“Franklin understands and empathizes with teachers, while giving them tools to go out and make improvements, not just changes in their schools.” B. Steele

“The best presentation in my teaching career.”  L. Johnson, English Teacher

Originally posted on July 15, 2011 by Franklin Schargel

Politicians – What’s Wrong With These People?

I have returned from a trip to Texas, where the Governor of the state (who might run for president) has just slashed educational spending. This has resulted in the laying off of thousands of educators.  But it is not just happening in Texas.  All across the country, education and educators are under assault.  From New York State, through Wisconsin to California, substantial cuts are being made in education without regard to parents, students, and educators.  Whatever happened to the cries for a globally competitive school system?  Where are the teacher unions, The AFT and NEA?  Where is the business community?  Where are the voices of sanity?

I believe, and pray that I am wrong, that with the reduction of adults in schools and the consolidation of classrooms and schools, we will face increased school violence.  At that time, we will hear from the media, the business community, the teacher unions, and the politicians who will say, “how did this happen?”

Originally posted on July 11, 2011 by Franklin Schargel

TIME & DATE CHANGE SREB High Schools That Work Conference

SREB has changed the time and date of my speaking.  Please take note.

Franklin has been selected to make two presentations at the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) High Schools That Work Conference to be held in Nashville, TN.  On Thursday, July 21 at 9:30AM, Franklin will be presenting a workshop entitled “It’s Time to End the Plague of School Dropouts” in the Presidential Ballroom A.

On Thursday, July 21 at 2:15 PM, Franklin will be presenting a workshop entitled “School Leadership and School Cultures That Build Graduation Rates” in the Presidential Ballroom A.

The conference will be held at the Opryland Hotel.  Stop by and enjoy the workshops and say hello.

Originally posted on July 5, 2011 by Franklin Schargel

Education’s Next Crisis!

My latest Huffington Post blog has been posted. It is entitled, “America’s Next Educational Crisis” but can also apply in foreign nations as well.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/franklin-schargel/americas-next-educational_b_883381.html

It’s also permanently listed in your author archive:

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/franklin-schargel/

Originally posted on July 5, 2011 by Franklin Schargel

Book Reading: The Implications for Educators

The following statistics about book publishing and reading were found on www.parapub.com, this is the Web site of self-publishing guru Dan Poynter. They’ll give you an idea of what you’re up against if you are trying to encourage students to read.

  • 1/3 of high school graduates never read another book for the rest of their lives.
  • 42 percent of college graduates never read another book after college.
  • 80 percent of U.S. families did not buy or read a book last year.
  • 70 percent of U.S. adults have not been in a bookstore in the last five years.
  • 57 percent of new books are not read to completion.
  • 70 percent of books published do not earn back their advance.
  • 70 percent of the books published do not make a profit.
    (Source: Jerold Jenkins, www.JenkinsGroupInc.com)
  • 53 percent read fiction, 43 percent read nonfiction. The favorite fiction category is mystery and suspense, at 19 percent.
  • 55 percent of fiction is bought by women, 45 percent by men.
    (Source: Publishers Weekly)
  • About 120,000 books are published each year in the U.S.
    (Source: www.bookwire.com)
  • A successful fiction book sells 5,000 copies.
  • A successful nonfiction book sells 7,500 copies.
    (Source: Authors Guild, www.authorsguild.org)
  • On average, a bookstore browser spends 8 seconds looking at a book’s front cover and 15 seconds looking at the back cover.
    (Source: Para Publishing, www.parapub.com)
  • Each day in the U.S., people spend 4 hours watching TV, 3 hours listening to the radio and 14 minutes reading magazines.
    (Source: Veronis, Suhler & Associates investment banker)

Originally posted on July 1, 2011 by Franklin Schargel

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 108
  • Go to page 109
  • Go to page 110
  • Go to page 111
  • Go to page 112
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 153
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 1994–2025 · Schargel Consulting Group · All Rights Reserved