• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Franklin Schargel

Developing World Class Schools and Graduates

  • Blog
  • 15 Strategies
  • About
  • Dropout Prevention
  • Safe Schools
  • School Success
  • At-Risk Youth
  • All Books

Franklin Schargel’s Blog

2015’s States With The Highest and Lowest SAT Scores

WalletHub.com compared the quality of education in the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia by analyzing 13 key metrics that range from student-teacher ratios, through dropout rates.

According to the study the 2015 States with the:

The Highest Average SAT Score

  1. North Dakota
  2. Illinois
  3. Iowa
  4. South Dakota
  5. Minnesota

Lowest Average SAT Score

  1. Texas
  2. Maine
  3. Idaho
  4. Delaware
  5. District of Columbia

 

Originally posted on December 8, 2016 by Franklin Schargel

2015’s States With The Safest and Least Safe Schools

WalletHub.com compared the quality of education in the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia by analyzing 13 key metrics that range from student-teacher ratios, through dropout rates.

According to the study the 2015 States with the:

 The Safest School Districts

  1. Wisconsin
  2. Massachusetts
  3. Oklahoma
  4. Kansas and Maine

The Least Safe School Districts

  1. Tennessee
  2. Maryland
  3. Alabama
  4. Arkansas

The Lowest Bullying School Districts

  1. Florida
  2. New Mexico
  3. Massachusetts and Mississippi
  4. Delaware

The Highest Bullying School Districts

  1. Maine
  2. Missouri
  3. Michigan
  4. Idaho
  5. Montana

Originally posted on December 6, 2016 by Franklin Schargel

2015’s States With The Highest and Lowest Test Scores

WalletHub.com compared the quality of education in the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia by analyzing 13 key metrics that range from student-teacher ratios, through dropout rates.

According to the study the 2015 States with the:

Highest Math Test Scores

  1. Massachusetts
  2. New Hampshire
  3. Minnesota
  4. New Jersey
  5. Vermont

Lowest Math Test Scores

  1. New Mexico
  2. Louisiana
  3. Alabama
  4. Mississippi
  5. District of Columbia

Highest Reading Test Scores

  1. Massachusetts
  2. Maryland and New Hampshire
  3. Connecticut and New Jersey

Lowest Reading Test Scores

  1. Alaska
  2. Louisiana
  3. Mississippi
  4. New Mexico
  5. District of Columbia

 

Originally posted on December 1, 2016 by Franklin Schargel

2015’s States With The Best and Worst School Systems

WalletHub.com compared the quality of education in the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia by analyzing 13 key metrics that range from student-teacher ratios, through dropout rates.

According to the study the 2015 States with the:

Best School Systems

  1. Iowa
  2. Nebraska and Texas and North Dakota and New Jersey and Wisconsin

The 5 worst state school systems are:

  1. Alaska and Georgia
  2. Nevada
  3. New Mexico
  4. Oregon
  5. District of Columbia

Originally posted on November 29, 2016 by Franklin Schargel

Among children aged 10 to 14, death by suicide is now more common than death from traffic accidents.

On November 3, 2016, the New York Times reported that it is now just as likely for middle school students to die from suicide as from traffic accidents. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that in 2014, the most recent year for which data is available, the suicide rate for children ages 10 to 14 had caught up to their death rate for traffic accidents. Death is a rare event for adolescents. But the unprecedented rise in suicide among children at such young ages, however small the number, was troubling. In all, 425 children ages 10 to 14 killed themselves in 2014. In contrast, 384 children of that age died in car accidents. In 1999, the death rate for children ages 10 to 14 from traffic accidents “” about 4.5 deaths per 100,000 “” was quadruple the rate for suicide. But by 2014, the death rate from car crashes had been cut in half. The suicide rate, however, had nearly doubled, with most of the increase happening since 2007. In 2014, the suicide death rate was 2.1 per 100,000.

Far more boys than girls killed themselves in 2014 “” 275 boys to 150 girls “” in line with adults in the general population. American men kill themselves at far higher rates than women. But the increase for girls was much sharper “” a tripling, compared with a rise of about a third for boys.

The reasons for suicide are complex. No single factor causes it. But social media tends to exacerbate the challenges and insecurities girls are already wrestling with at that age, possibly heightening risks, adolescent health experts said. Social media is, in part, responsible.

Statistically, girls dominate visual platforms like Facebook and Instagram where they receive instant validation from their peers, she said. It also is a way to quantify popularity, and take things that used to be private and intangible and make them public and tangible. It used to be that you didn’t know how many friends someone had, or what they were doing after school

Social media assigns numbers to those things. For the most vulnerable girls, that can be very destabilizing.”

The public aspect can be particularly painful. Social media exponentially amplifies humiliation, and an unformed, vulnerable child who is humiliated is at much higher risk of suicide than she would otherwise have been.

Another profound change has been that girls are going through puberty at earlier ages. Today girls get their first period at age 12 and a half on average. That means girls are becoming young women at an age when they are less equipped to deal with the issues that raises “” sex and gender identity, peer relationships, more independence from family. Girls experience depression at twice the rate of boys in adolescence. Depression is being diagnosed more often these days, and adolescents are taking more medication than ever before, but Dr. Levy-Warren cautioned that it was not clear whether that is because more people are actually depressed, or because it is simply being identified more than before.

 

Originally posted on November 24, 2016 by Franklin Schargel

Condom Use Among Teenagers Declines

According to the Centers for Disease Control reported by Child Trends, in 2015, fewer than six in ten high school students who were sexually active reported using condoms at their most recent sexual intercourse. Condom use among this group increased from 46 percent in 1991, to 63 percent in 2003, but has since declined, reaching 57 percent in 2015. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs, including HIV/AIDS) and unintended pregnancy are major health issues that can be consequences of unprotected sexual activity. In 2011, there were more than 552,000 pregnancies to teenage girls ages 15-19 in the United States, three-quarters of which were unintended. Nearly half a million adolescents were diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis in 2014.Condoms, if used correctly, can greatly reduce (though not eliminate) the risk of both STIs and unintended pregnancies. Although the majority of adolescents believe that “sex without a condom is not worth the risk,” many teens are misinformed about the protection that condoms provide against STIs and HIV/AIDS.

Several factors are associated with lower likelihood of condom use among teens, including a large age difference between partners, having experienced sexual abuse, and substance abuse Conversely, factors associated with increased condom use in sexual relationships include higher parental education, more parental communication about contraception, having attended a sexual education course that discusses contraception, and believing that condoms are effective at preventing pregnancy and STIs. In 2011-2013, 97 percent of sexually experienced female teens had used a condom at least once.

Trends

Condom use at the most recent sexual intercourse, as reported by sexually active high school students, increased from 46 percent in 1991, to a high of 63 percent in 2003. Since then, there has been a small but steady decrease, to 57 percent in 2015.

Differences by Gender

Reported condom use differs by gender. In 2015, 62 percent of sexually active male high school students reported that they or their partner used a condom at their most recent sexual intercourse, compared with 52 percent of females. Black males were 27 percentage points more likely than black females to report condom use at last sexual intercourse, Hispanic males were 14 percentage points, and white males were 2 percentage points more likely than their female counterparts to report using a condom.

Differences by Race and Hispanic Origin

Black male students were more likely than white male students to report condom use (74 and 58 percent, respectively) in 2015. No other race/ethnicity differences were statistically significant.

Definition

Students were asked the following question: “The last time you had sexual intercourse, did you or your partner use a condom?” Estimates here are limited to those who are currently sexually active (i.e., had sexual intercourse within the last three months). Note that students may also use other methods of contraception instead of, or in addition to, condoms.

Originally posted on November 22, 2016 by Franklin Schargel

It’s The Children Who Are Being Bullied

Since Mr. Trump’s election, the Southern Poverty Law Center has received more than 430 reports of bullying, harassment and racist displays around the country. “We haven’t seen this volume in the United States in decades, with the exception of the wave of anti-Muslim incidents that followed 9/11,” said Ryan Lenz, a spokesman for the center. They include real and painful episodes at secondary schools and colleges. While I do not wish to blame the president-elect, his rhetoric during the debates and during the campaign have unleashed some crazies and gives others license to do the same.

Social media and the television networks are spreading the hate. In Minnesota where racist graffiti has appeared in a high school or Pennsylvania where white students were filmed walking through a school with a Trump sign yelling, “White Power”, this behavior is unacceptable. Muslim students have been attacked. At the University of Michigan, a man told a student that if she did not take off her hijab he would he would set her on fire with a lighter.

Children are the most fragile of our society. Who gets bullied? Those who are poor, or rich or members of the LGBTQ community or religious or ethnic minorities or those who are fat or those who are skinny, are targeted. But the largest groups who are targeted are those with disabilities or are gay. In other words, Everyone.

 

President-elect Trump was asked about this on “60 Minutes” Mr. Trump the perpetrators should stop. But he also played down the damage, “I think it’s a very small amount.” Any amount of racist hate is too much. The incoming first lady, Melania Trump on November 13, 2016 promised to be an “advocate for women and for children”.  Now is the time for Mr. Trump and Mrs. Trump and other political leaders (governors, Senators, and Representatives) to rise to the occasion and condemn this hatred. Parents and students also need to take a vigorous stand condemning these words and these racist actions.

 

America is watching.

 

I will be delivering workshops in Albuquerque, Dallas, South Carolina and Georgia about what schools, parents and children can do to stop bullying. Visit my website, www.schargel.com for more details.

 

 

Originally posted on November 16, 2016 by Franklin Schargel

America’s Child Poverty Rate

According to the latest US Census Bureau Report, the child poverty rate for 2015 was 19.7 percent. Can you imagine, in the richest country in the world almost one fifth of our children are growing up in households where they are living paycheck to paycheck? What is this doing to their bodies, to their minds, to their ability to learn?

The poverty rate for children’s the highest of all age groups.

What is wrong with this picture?

Originally posted on November 10, 2016 by Franklin Schargel

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 36
  • Go to page 37
  • Go to page 38
  • Go to page 39
  • Go to page 40
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Archives

Copyright © 1994–2025 · Schargel Consulting Group · All Rights Reserved